End-of-Season Exit Strategies: Mark Down, Bundle, Carry Forward, or Liquidate?
Every season ends with unsold inventory. The decisions you make about that inventory — mark down, bundle, carry forward, sell to off-price, or liquidate — directly affect your margin, cash flow, and brand perception. This guide provides a decision framework for each option.
The exit decision
Every apparel season ends with unsold inventory. Even the best-planned brands carry 10–15% of their buy past the intended selling window. The question is not whether you'll have excess — it's what you'll do with it.
End-of-season exit strategy is the plan for how you dispose of inventory that remains after the primary selling period. The five options — markdown, bundle, carry forward, off-price/liquidation, and donation/destruction — each carry different tradeoffs. The right choice depends on the style, the brand, the margin, and the cash position.
Option 1: Markdown (sell through your own channels)
What it is: Reduce the price on your DTC site, in your stores, or through a dedicated sale section. The customer buys at the reduced price through your own channels.
Best for: Fashion styles with remaining demand, styles with 30–60% remaining inventory, mid-price-point products where customers are price-elastic.
Tiered markdown approach
| Timing | Markdown depth | Expected outcome | |--------|---------------|-----------------| | Week 1–2 of sale period | 20–25% off | Captures price-sensitive customers who wanted the product but waited | | Week 3–4 | 30–40% off | Moves moderate volume, reaches deal-seekers | | Week 5+ | 50%+ off | Final clearance, moves remaining units |
Margin math
A $100 retail item with 62% IMU costs $38. At 30% markdown ($70), you still make $32 (46% margin). At 50% markdown ($50), you make $12 (24% margin). At 60% markdown ($40), you make $2 (5% margin). Below 60% off, you're approaching break-even.
Pros: You control the customer experience, collect customer data, and maintain the direct relationship. Higher margin recovery than off-price.
Cons: Frequent markdowns train customers to wait for sales. Your brand email becomes "sale" messaging. Full-price sell-through in future seasons may decline.
The markdown trap: once a customer buys from you at 40% off, they benchmark your brand at that price. Getting them back to full price is significantly harder. This is why some brands (Everlane, Patagonia) run sales only 1–2 times per year — they protect full-price perception at the cost of carrying more inventory.
Option 2: Bundle (combine with other products)
What it is: Package slow-selling items with faster-selling items as a "set" or "outfit bundle" at a combined price that's lower than individual retail but higher than the markdown price for the slow item alone.
Best for: Items that complement bestsellers, accessories paired with apparel, styles that need context to sell (a scarf bundled with a coat, a tank top bundled with pants).
How to structure bundles
- Hero + slow: Pair a bestseller with a slow-moving item at 15–20% off the combined price. The hero drives the purchase; the slow item gets moved.
- Outfit bundles: Top + bottom + accessory at 20–25% off. Customers see value; you move 3 items instead of 1.
- Size-run closeout: "Complete your wardrobe — 3 basics for $X." Move excess in specific sizes.
Pros: Higher perceived value than a flat markdown. Moves slow inventory while boosting average order value. Can feel like a "deal" rather than a "sale."
Cons: Only works for complementary items. Requires merchandising effort to create bundles. Can feel forced if the pairing doesn't make sense.
Option 3: Carry forward (hold for next season)
What it is: Hold unsold inventory and re-offer it in the next appropriate season. A Fall fleece that didn't sell in F/W 2025 gets re-offered in F/W 2026.
Best for: Core basics (t-shirts, denim, essentials), classic styles that aren't trend-dependent, items with long shelf life, and brands with the cash position to hold inventory.
The carry-forward calculation
| Factor | Impact | |--------|--------| | Carrying cost (6–12 months storage) | Adds 15–25% to product cost | | Opportunity cost of capital | Cash locked in inventory can't fund new buys | | Fashion risk | Will the style still be relevant next season? | | Customer perception | Will your customer see it as "old"? |
Decision rule: Carry forward only if:
- The style is a proven core with >70% sell-through in previous seasons
- The remaining quantity is less than one full re-run MOQ (otherwise it's cheaper to reorder fresh)
- The style is not trend-dependent (no seasonal colors, no trend silhouettes)
- You have the cash position to hold without constraining next season's OTB
Pros: No markdown needed. Preserves full retail pricing for the style. Avoids brand dilution.
Cons: Carrying costs erode margin over time. Ties up cash and warehouse space. Fashion risk if trends shift.
Option 4: Off-price / liquidation (sell to third parties)
What it is: Sell remaining inventory to off-price retailers (TJ Maxx, Nordstrom Rack, Rue La La), sample sale platforms (260 Sample Sale, The RealReal), or wholesale liquidators.
Best for: Large quantities of excess (500+ units per style), fashion styles with no carry-forward potential, brands that want clean exits without running their own sales.
Off-price pricing reality
- Off-price retailers (TJ Maxx, etc.): Buy at 20–40% of your wholesale price (which is roughly 10–20% of retail)
- Sample sale platforms: You retain 40–60% of the selling price (which is already 40–70% off retail)
- Wholesale liquidators: Buy at 5–15% of wholesale cost — last resort
Margin math (off-price)
$100 retail item, $50 wholesale, $38 cost. TJ Maxx offers $15/unit. Your margin is -$23/unit (loss). But you recover $15 in cash per unit, which is better than holding $38 in carrying cost for another 6 months.
Pros: Clean exit. Cash recovery. No brand email marketing required. Off-price customer may not overlap with your full-price customer.
Cons: Significant margin loss. Risk of brand dilution if your product appears on discount racks frequently. Loss of control over presentation and pricing.
If you sell to off-price regularly, some brands remove or swap labels/packaging so the off-price version doesn't look identical to the full-price version. This creates a visual separation between channels.
Option 5: Donate or destroy (last resort)
What it is: Donate remaining inventory to charitable organizations or destroy it.
Best for: Very small remaining quantities not worth the operational cost of markdown/bundling/liquidation, defective goods, and items with expired or damaged branding.
The regulatory shift
The EU's ESPR regulation will make it illegal to destroy unsold textiles by 2026. Brands selling in Europe — even US-based brands with European distribution — will need to demonstrate responsible disposition. Donation to verified organizations will likely be the compliant alternative to destruction.
Pros: Clean exit. Potential tax benefit from donation. Brand-positive if communicated well.
Cons: Zero margin recovery. Logistical cost of sorting, packaging, and shipping donations.
The pre-season exit strategy framework
The best exit strategies are decided before the season starts. For each style in your assortment, assign a classification and pre-define the exit path:
| Style classification | In-season trigger | Exit strategy | |---------------------|-------------------|---------------| | Core basics | If sell-through < 60% at week 8 | Carry forward (proven demand next season) | | Seasonal fashion | If sell-through < 40% at week 4 | Markdown 20% → 40% → bundle → off-price | | Test / new styles | If sell-through < 30% at week 4 | Aggressive markdown → liquidate | | Wholesale excess | If excess > 20% of PO | Off-price or carry forward if core |
The key: decide when to act and what to do before the pressure hits. Under pressure, brands either hold too long (hoping for a miracle) or markdown too aggressively (panic selling).
Tracking exit effectiveness
After each season, measure:
- Markdown rate: What percentage of the assortment was marked down?
- Average markdown depth: What was the average discount?
- Markdown margin: What was the actual MMU on marked-down items?
- Carry-forward rate: What percentage of inventory was carried forward?
- Off-price/liquidation volume: How much went to third parties?
- Gross margin impact: How much did exit strategies impact overall season margin?
Track these metrics season-over-season. If your markdown rate is increasing, your initial planning needs adjustment — you're overbuying.
See how RetailNorthstar tracks sell-through against plan and flags exit strategy triggers automatically — so you're acting at week 4, not reacting at week 12.
Book a Demo →Further reading
- Markdown Optimization Strategies — when and how to mark down effectively
- The Excess Inventory Crisis — understanding the scale of the overproduction problem
- Sustainability in Apparel Planning — the environmental case for better exit planning
- Scenario Planning for Retail — modeling exit scenarios before the season
- 42 Real-World Problems for Growing Apparel Brands — exit strategy in the context of operational challenges
Share this guide with your team
Copy a link or a pre-written message for Slack, Teams, or email.
// Know where your operation stands
Apply this to your planning operation.
The free Apparel Planning Maturity Assessment benchmarks your operation and tells you exactly which gaps to fix first.